Jack of Kent’s Law: The Australian Vaccination Network witch-hunt

Jack of Kent

Jack of Kent

The marvellous skepti-legal blogger David Allen Green, writing at Jack of Kent, has coined a new adage in the vein of Godwin’s LawPoe’s Law and Skopie’s Law. Here’s how David sets out Jack of Kent’s Law:

Such are the responses of the challenged bully, just as “lessons learned” and “draw a line” are the invariable excuses of the exposed incompetent.

Being unwillingly held to public account within a lawful process is not a witch-hunt.

One hesitates to posit a general law as to this kind of reaction.

However, as the original “Jack of Kent” was a medieval wizard, and so presumably had a view on witch-hunts, I would like to to offer the following adaptation of Godwin’s Law:

The longer any person or entity is placed under any deliberate and sustained scrutiny, the probability of someone complaining of it being a “witch-hunt” approaches 1.

I wonder how well this “law” works in practice…

Jack of Kent had, among others, poor stressed-out News International brass in mind. The law certainly seems to hold true for them. But for me, the appeal of the law was in the number of other examples that sprang into my own head.

Witch-hunt of British chiropractors

Take for example, the useless spine wizards at the British Chiropractic Association, who didn’t take it well when Simon Singh called them out for happily promoting bogus treatments. They were even more aghast when Muggles actually had the nerve to look at their websites:

If you are reading this, we assume you have also read the urgent email we sent you last Friday. If you did not read it, READ IT VERY CAREFULLY NOW and – this is most important – ACT ON IT. This is not scaremongering. We judge this to be a real threat to you and your practice.

Because of what we consider to be a witch hunt against chiropractors, we are now issuing the following advice:

The target of the campaigners is now any claims for treatment that cannot be substantiated with chiropractic research.

You may write your own jokes about the term ‘chiropractic research’. If you have time to comment, I’d like to know what you think such a discipline might involve.

Meryl Dorey witch-hunt

I would.

Tenuously relevant Bellatrix Lestrange pic

But of course, the British chiropractors have nothing on Australia’s leading brain-owner Meryl Dorey, of the Australian Vaccination Network. The Wicked Witch of the Northern Rivers has a persecution complex that borders on the theological. Indeed, she once even compared her suffering at the hands of the tyrannous Stop The AVN to that of Jesus of Nazareth. So has she been witch-hunted? You can bet the farm on it:

Letter to the Editor – Witch-hunt of vaccine safety watchdog
The Australian Vaccination Network has been vilified in the media in recent weeks. While it is the media’s job to expose wrongdoing when it has been found, it is not their job to act as judge, jury and executioner.

Newspapers and radio stations have been reporting ridiculous lies stating that the AVN believes in reptilian aliens and mind-control chips. They got this misinformation from Mr Ken McLeod, an active member of a group that has set out to either shut our small, volunteer-run organisation down or shut us up in any way they can. That is their agenda. What is the media’s excuse?

[...]

The AVN are vaccine whistleblowers and, like all organisations that are perceived to threaten an entrenched status quo, we are now being victimised by a group that openly states their object is to stop us in any way they can. Their tactics include death threats, threats of violence, calling our supporters to threaten them, filing complaints with every government body they can think of and generally inciting fear, hatred and violence towards us in the community – all with the support and cooperation of the government and the media.
(Source)

Or take this media release from 2002, which sees Meryl taking crayon to butcher’s paper in indignation at the suggestion that doctors should practice medicine:

Prof. John Dwyer, in an attempt to create a smoke-screen covering up Australia’s shocking record of medical safety, has called for the deregistration of doctors who use complimentary medical procedures.

[...]

“In a press release which was accidentally leaked from the office of the NSW Minister for Health, dated October 31, 2002, it is stated that the aim of this committee is to tighten up legislation, enabling practitioners who are involved in dodgy medical practices (dodgy according to whom?) to be struck off. This is a witch-hunt, plain and simple. A way for the powers that control medicine to ensure that all doctors think, act and prescribe alike with no dissent in the ranks allowed. The NSW Government has instituted a bureau of medical ‘Thought Police’ and John Dwyer is the Head Inquisitor.” Ms Dorey continued.
(Source)

Do read the rest. It’s a cracker.

Salem Witch Trial

Australian Vaccination Network Inc v Health Care Complaints Commission

There are surely countless more. Andrew Wakefield and 2011 champion recipient of fraud allegations psychic Sally Morgan spring to mind.

Can you think of any other examples of witch-hunts?

William Lane Craig: The Bathrobe

I’ve noted before that I find the term ‘christian humility‘ oxymoronic: there is nothing humble about claiming a personal relationship with the creator of the universe.

And almost as tediously predictable as the christian claiming to be humble is the christian calling the new atheists ‘arrogant’.

But any Gnu you could name would have a fair way to sink before they became as mind-bogglingly saturated with hubris as William LOL Craig. May I present: the Reasonable Faith dressing gown. Yes, it’s a thing.

William Lane Craig dressing gown

William Lane Craig dressing gown

When it’s time to relax, there’s nothing sweeter than plush terry velour generously cut for comfort.

- The William Lane Craig online merch emporium.

I know what you’re thinking, dear Dave The Happy Singer RSS Subscriber. Because I thought it too:

Awww… isn’t it a shame that Dr Craig didn’t model it himself?

Well, if this isn’t the reason the GIMP was invented, I’m buggered if I know what was.

The William Lane Craig bathrobe

The William Lane Craig bathrobe

Meryl Dorey at the Conscious Living Expo

From the Australian Vaccination Network‘s blog comes an interview with Patricia Hamilton of the ‘Concious Living Expo’. The Conscious Living Expo was a conference last weekend, offering keynotes from:

  • Dolores Canon, hypnotherapist and psychic researcher, who offered a workshop on the Mayan calendar and 2012, as well as a ‘training course’ in something called ‘Quantum Healing Hypnosis’.

(Warning: if you’re going to play the drinking game, you may as well call the ambulance now).

  • Anthony Grezlka, a ’leading’ Australian medium and ghost whisperer with a seminar entitled ‘Life, Death and Back Again: What happens after we die and a new look at reincarnation’.
  • Billie Dean, an animal shaman,  with a workshop on ‘Interspecies Communication’, who also promises ‘Animal Readings on Stage (BYO Photo)’.
  • Dr Sandra McRae Cabot, author of ‘many groundbreaking books about the holistic prevention of disease’. She ran a seminar inviting attendees to ‘Love Your Liver’.
  • Dr Antonia Ruhl, an ‘Amazonian Medicine Woman’ offering exciting events like ‘Natural Fertility Friday’, ‘Bio-Identical Foods’ and ‘Soul Retrieval’

Seriously, this is hurting now. Never mind my liver, Dr Cabot, my sides are in mortal danger. Though I must confess to a passing interest in ‘Natural Fertility Friday’ with an Amazonian medicine woman. Apart from the obvious, I would like to know what supernatural fertility would entail. I also want to know what ‘non-bio-identical’ foods could be. Don’t eat bricks, guys.

Anyway, back to the  fucking insanity ‘issues outside of the mainstream worldview’.

  • Dr Peter Dingle. Yes, that Peter Dingle. ‘The Great Cholesterol Deception Sunday’ is the title of his offering. I wouldn’t dream of suggesting his contribution would be anything else.

But wait, it gets better! Conscious Living Expo also offers a whole raft of psychics! Here’s a small, somewhat terrifying, sample:

Conscious Living Expo Psychics

Conscious Living Expo Psychics

Myrtle Harvey

I have 30 plus years experience as a natural and directchannel. Using Tarot, Tea Leaf Readings, Mediumship andPsychic Art I will give messages to you direct from the Universe. I don’t beat around the bush.

Ros Booth

*** Free gift with all readings *** I am an internationally accomplished Psychic-Medium, Angel Intuitive™, Author and Weight Wellness Coachwith qualifications in Reiki, Crystal Healing and SocialWelfare. Using my psychic skills and Angel Oracle cards, I will communicate guidance, clarity and positive messagesfor your present day situations. I will gift 3 Angel cardsto you, to bring abundant energy and encouragement toyour positive life choices.

Conscious Living Expo censorship

Meryl Dorey, of course, knew that this would be the perfect way to repair her shattered reputation. She was once Australia’s leading vaccine expert, dontcha know?

But, oh! There’s a scandal afoot! As Meryl relates:

When Patricia sent Channel 10 a media release with the list of speakers, and they saw my name on that list, they withdrew their sponsorship of the Conscious Living Expo. Aside from the fact that this is a not-so-subtle form of censorship, I want you to be aware that Patricia has foregone some much-needed sponsorship in order to allow those who attended the Expo to hear information about a subject that is taboo to mainstream media but is very, very important.

For her ethics as well as her refusal to back down in the face of severe pressure from a very powerful media outlet, I applaud Patricia and hope you will as well. As for Channel 10 – a great big thumbs down for not supporting your viewers with balanced information.

I’m somewhat surprised, I confess, that it took an appearance by Meryl to stop Channel 10 touching Golgafrincham Ark B with a ten-foot tractor beam. Nevertheless, if Meryl really was the reason sanity prevailed at Ten, I have only one response:

Good.

Not giving Meryl and her friends money isn’t ‘not-so-subtle censorship’. No firm in their right mind would sponsor this rubbish.

Stop The Australian Vaccination Network

Immunity: a short film about vaccination

This will move you.

Immunity, by Startail Tumbler productions

Last week, Jasmine took part in a film-making marathon called Kino Kabaret, a short film festival in which film-makers are challenged to shepherd a film from idea to screen in 32 hours. ‘Immunity’, embedded above, is Jasmine’s contribution.
Read More »

CPX: Chinese toddler, John Dickson’s Humilitas and Josephus

I’m starting to find the output of the Centre for Public Christianity more god-awful than that of the Australian Christian Lobby.

CPX recently tried to exploit the sad story of the Chinese toddler Wang Yue, who died after being hit by a truck. 18 passers-by left it to someone else to deal with, which happened in seven minutes. It was a shocking and heartbreaking story, but apparently a one-off.

Meanwhile, right now, in the time it took you to read my post to this point, two or three children have died, probably of a poverty-related cause. I hope you weren’t standing by doing nothing.

Rather than put the awful, singular story of Wang Yue in perspective, of course, CPX was off trying to link it to atheism.

In many countries, what are called “Good Samaritan” laws protect from liability those who offer emergency assistance but aren’t professionally qualified to help. In some jurisdictions laws impose on bystanders the duty to care for others, and so penalise those who shirk this responsibility.

Such laws get their name, of course, from Jesus’s parable in which a Samaritan is the only person to stop to help a man left beaten beside the road. Though some would have us move beyond the West’s Judeo-Christian heritage, it’s difficult to entirely shrug it off – as witnessed in these laws that oblige us to care for each other.

The point of the parable of the ‘good Samaritan’, of course, is to demonstrate that religious piety and cultural heritage have got fuck-all to do with behaving like a decent human being. The one thing the good Samaritan wasn’t was christian. He was a fiction-within-a-fiction, a character who did the right thing without the curse of a ‘Judeo-Christian heritage’, because it was the right thing to do.

Read More »

I found the accurate page on Conservapedia!

The article 'Evidence for God' on Conservapedia

The article 'Evidence for God' on Conservapedia

So… do I win a prize?

What is herd immunity?

Stop The Australian Vaccination Network
Why do you care if I don’t vaccinate my children? If your vaccines were really that effective, you shouldn’t care, should you?

This is by far the most common argument I hear from anti-vaxxers. If we pretend that I don’t care whether non-vaccinators or their children get ill, then at least I’m ok, because I’m vaccinated, right? Some go further, and suggest that if I’m bothered whether other people get vaccinated too, then it can’t be just because vaccines work. I must have some other motive. Right?

Wrong.

Vaccines work in two ways

Chain of ProtectionYour vaccines protect you. If you are vaccinated for a disease, your chance of getting that disease is starkly reduced. But that isn’t the whole story, because:

Your vaccine stops the disease spreading If your vaccination is successful, you’re not passing around the disease. If everyone around you is vaccinated, they aren’t passing it around either. If the disease enters the community, it finds very few opportunities to spread from person to person. It has nowhere to go, so it doesn’t go anywhere.

Vaccines are not 100% effective. Some people will be at risk even if they have been immunised. Furthermore, there are people around us who can’t be vaccinated. Babies who haven’t had all their immunisations yet. People whose immune system has been weakened by another illness. But because vaccines slow or stop the spread of a disease, then the chance of the disease even getting to the vulnerable few is low. In other words:

Your vaccine protects everyone else.

This is the awesome, awesome thing called herd immunity.

How does herd immunity work?

It’s a beautifully elegant concept. It’s simple and powerful, like the sexiest of all science. But if it’s not quite clicked with you, please watch this video. It’s only two minutes and it’s fantastic. It’s from the Chain of Protection website, by Professor Robert Booy. He’s a bit of a hero of mine. Check it out:

 

Herd Immunity – How it works from Chain of Protection.

Why do I care if you are vaccinated?

Because herd immunity means our vaccinations will protect those who aren’t protected by their own vaccinations. We all get to be lifesavers!

But it will only work if enough of us are fully vaccinated. So get your shots, guys.

One for MediaWatch: anti-vaccination nonsense on ABC Science! #StopAVN

Stop The Australian Vaccination NetworkAmong the many successes of Stop The Australian Vaccination Network, the correction of false balance has been one of the most important.

Time was, whenever a big story related to vaccination broke, out would bustle Meryl Dorey of the AVN to offer her opinion in the interests of ‘putting the other side’. But unlike politics, scientific understanding is not a matter of opinion. If you don’t have the evidence, then you don’t have another side. This is why the carpet painted by God is overlooked in astronomical news items.

In recent years, things seem to have got better. The anti-vaccination movement has undergone a thorough credibilectomy. Andrew Wakefield is discredited, Jenny McCarthy has gone quiet and antivax loons are held to much better account.

But now and again, something goes wrong.

Today, ABC Science posted an article by Anna Salleh that got things pretty badly wrong.

Vaccine and cancer experts in Australia have defended criticism of the Australia’s HPV vaccination program.

The criticisms have been raised by Judy Wilyman, who is completing a PhD on the Australian government’s vaccination policy at the University of Wollongong.

Yeah, the wording confused me too. I think it means this:

Vaccine and cancer experts have dismissed unfounded scaremongering about government policy from a postgraduate student

The article goes on to enumerate a long list of half-baked anti-vaccination claims, redressed with only perfunctory attention to actual experts in the subject.

Who is Judy Wilyman?

The student making the claims, Judy Wilyman, is no stranger to #StopAVN. She has appeared on a double-bill of crazy with Meryl Dorey on more than one occasion, credited somewhat dubiously as a ‘PhD researcher at Murdoch University’. She’s even been caught using Murdoch’s logo on marketing materials for the clown shows, to the Uni’s considerable annoyance.

While studying at Murdoch University, her still-unfinished PhD was supervised by one Dr Peter Dingle. That name may also be familiar to you. He is also not an expert in the field of vaccination. He is an environmental toxicologist turned alt. med. guru, whose wife tragically died after she rejected medical treatment for her cancer:

Last year’s coronial inquest into Mrs Dingle’s death found that Dr Dingle, who has no formal medical qualification, was actively involved in isolating his wife from the outside interferences of those recommending conventional medicine.

Now at the University of Wollongong, Judy Wilyman’s PhD work continues, supervised by Dr Brian Martin. Yes, that Brian Martin. He has for some while campaigned for the AVN’s freedom to say whatever they like, untrammelled by criticism (or indeed reality). Brian Martin is (of course!) not an expert in vaccinations or cancer either. His qualifications are in physics and he teaches social sciences.

Oh, and there’s yet another familiar name among the list of PhD students supervised by Brian Martin.

Anna Salleh.

WTF, ABC Science?

A poor choice

ABC Science have published a dangerously misleading article. In indulging the inexpert claims of a known anti-vaccination crank it goes against the grain of all sound medical advice, and its author’s undisclosed connections are worrying.

The ABC Science ‘Editor’s choice’ was ill-advised.

Over to you, Mr Holmes.

 

Outreach Media’s Evidence for God on Toast: fixed that for you

Lots of Australian churches outsource the creation of ‘witty’ posters to an outfit called Outreach Media, who have a new zinger for us each month. They were the people who produced the horrific Christian poster with the lion on. Well, their October effort is pretty bad, too. Just a bit less horrific, and a bit more stupid.

The Outreach Media 'Want Better Evidence' toast campaign

The Outreach Media 'Want Better Evidence' toast campaign

In case you can’t make it out, it’s a picture of an apparition of Jesus on a slice of toast, and the caption ‘WantBetterEvidence.org’

Want better evidence?

Why, yes, Outreach Media! I do want better evidence! That’s what we’ve been saying all along!

I’m sure you’re as excited as I am to see what they have to offer!

Actually, I’ll save you the bother. It’s the Bible. Because apparently, a self-contradictory bundle of myths about a zombie carpenter, cobbled together long after his supposed life, is evidence for miracles. And somehow that proves God.

I’ve got a slight problem with that. Actually, I’ve got quite a lot of pretty stonking huge problems with it. Here are a few off the top of my head:

  • You can’t demonstrate a miracle with a 2,000-year-old anecdote.
  • An anecdote of even a natural phenomenon is hardly reliable if it was passed on from person to illiterate person for decades.
  • There is a link or two missing in the syllogism: ‘Jesus, therefore god’.
  • No-one wrote about Jesus while he was alive. No-one.
  • The earliest biblical writings about Jesus (Paul’s epistles) don’t seem to square with the idea of a recently deceased human.
  • The earliest Gospel (Mark) overlooked some pretty big details. Like the virgin birth. And the resurrection.

There are dozens more holes in this stupid claim. Please add your favourites in the comments below!

Only a fool would think the biblical tales of Jesus support the historicity of the biblical tales of Jesus. Let alone the rarely-defined ‘God’. Speaking of the the big fella, if God is a real phenomenon, to be found throughout the natural world today, why do we need these Middle Eastern legends as evidence? The icing on the cake is when they link to the Centre for Public Christianity in the hope that CPX will get them out of their mess. It’s almost as though Outreach don’t read my blog!

I was, therefore, less than impressed with Outreach Media’s offering of ‘evidence of god’. I was amazed that they actually thought calling attention to the amount of evidence for god was a good idea.

Clearly, Dave, we really need your help.

- not an actual quote from Outreach Media

So I’m happy to offer them a little help:

IWantBetterEvidence.org: Evidence for God on Toast

Here’s a sneak preview. Click the toast for more:

 

Christianity is Toast

If you want better evidence of God...

Updates

Atheists, unicorns and the same lame Bible

From teh Twitters comes this stunning insight:

Grant Vandersee Unicorns
Grant Vandersee LOLs when you bring up unicorns, ROFL

Atheist: Indulge me; let’s say I had faith in an invisible purple unicorn on mars, who shaped the world with his magical horn.

Grant Vandersee, Online Christian Soldier: LOL how atheists always bring up unicorns. Do u all read from the same lame book? ROFL

Beautiful, isn’t it? The christian is accusing atheists of all reading from the same lame book.

Here’s another example: christians (and atheists, I’m afraid), sometimes claim Richard Dawkins is ‘arrogant’ for pointing out there is no need to believe in magic wish-granting sky faeries. This alleged arrogance pales in comparison to a grown adult’s serious claim that he is in a personal relationship with the creator of the entire universe.

Or consider the never-thought, often uttered claim that defenders of reason are ‘militant’ atheists. Poor Richard gets that one all the time. Yet christianity has been soaked in militant language (and occasionally action) since the beginning.

Unicorns in the Bible

But back to Grant Vandersee and his unicorns. For the beautiful delicious icing on this cake of irony, let’s read from the Same Lame Book as him:

His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh. (Deuteronomy 33:17 KJV)

Will the unicorn be willing to serve thee, or abide by thy crib? Canst thou bind the unicorn with his band in the furrow? or will he harrow the valleys after thee? (Job 39:9-10 KJV)

Save me from the lion’s mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns. (Psalm 22:21 KJV)

He maketh them also to skip like a calf; Lebanon and Sirion like a young unicorn. (Psalm 29:6 KJV)

But my horn shalt thou exalt like the horn of an unicorn: I shall be anointed with fresh oil. (Psalm 92:10 KJV)

God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn. (Numbers 23:22 KJV)

God brought him forth out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn: he shall eat up the nations his enemies, and shall break their bones, and pierce them through with his arrows. (Numbers 24:8 KJV)

And the unicorns shall come down with them, and the bullocks with the bulls; and their land shall be soaked with blood, and their dust made fat with fatness. (Isaiah 34:7 KJV)

The bible is lame

Of course, no-one would say the the biblical unicorn was a real animal, not an imaginary creature. Right?

The biblical unicorn was a real animal, not an imaginary creature.

- Answers in Genesis

Yes, but they’re wingnuts. No True Christian™ would say the biblical unicorn was a real animal. True Christians™ don’t believe in silly mythical beings. Christianity is serious business. God didn’t sacrifice himself to himself to atone for the sin we inherited from a woman made of a rib because she ate an apple a talking snake told her to for nothing, you know. And besides, the King James Version is riddled with bad translations. ‘Unicorn’ probably just meant a wild ox. Or a narwhal. Or something.

Anyway, I’ll let the christians deal with the rationalisation. I have to take Mr Unicorn for a walk now. Once I stop laughing.

Mr Unicorn

Mr Unicorn, my flatmate

UPDATE

Grant, you owe me a new fucking irony meter
Grant, you owe me a new fucking irony meter

Grant Vandersee: Amazing how quickly people can make assumptions and jump to conclusions despite no evidence. And indeed with conflicting evidence.